leon6854 (Mar 03, 2016 at 09:21:07 EST): crazy mike wins $80,700
Replies 1 - 3 of 3
|
pacific place wrote
at 9:25 AM, Thursday March 3, 2016 EST Rigged and fixed
|
|
JulesDogg wrote
at 12:15 PM, Thursday March 3, 2016 EST Flop: Mike checks, PP min-bets $200 in to $11700 out of position and get multiple calls. You've flop a gutshot and face 2 overcards. Why?
Turn:Mike checks, PP min-bets $200 in to $12500 out of position and get multiple calls.The turn card had changed nothing for you. What are these min bets achieving. What is your thought process and reason for taking these lines? River: Mike checks, PP min-bets $200 in to $11700 out of position and get multiple calls. In doing so you open the door for Mike. Mike makes a very large bet. What could he have there? Did you pause for thought before going ape-shit crazy? Did you ever think you could be beat there? Showdown: Mike shows NUT Straight, you're beat! Should you raise the river there? What worse hands will Mike call with? Has he played it like a set? No! Would he call with a set? Probably not! Where is the value in raising? You don't get ANY better hands to fold, you only ever get a call from 9X or Q9!!!!! Every street is played horribly and the analysis is; quote "Rigged and fixed". Is this outcome really the fault of a dodgy algorithm? Take a look at how Alec Torelli extracts max value in a situation that has some similarities> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9XkFi83ZncU |
|
pacific place wrote
at 12:34 AM, Saturday March 5, 2016 EST Thx 4 the advice jules. I will watch it in April
|