Forum
50k max at 1k table shit
|
deccanchargers wrote
at 12:58 AM, Monday November 17, 2008 EST
cmmon r u not kidding every 1 is calling any thing.lots of allins more n more chasers more n more g rivering.
|
Replies 1 - 6 of 6
|
deccanchargers wrote
at 1:00 AM, Monday November 17, 2008 EST there should me min n max atleast
|
|
Deano Supremo wrote
at 3:26 AM, Monday November 17, 2008 EST I have to agree... There aint that buzz of losing or winning big (#300,000)... this table used to be cool... Now it's just evened out the playing field... What's the point in that??? We have big and small stacks for a reason.
|
|
odnexa1 wrote
at 4:33 AM, Monday November 17, 2008 EST i agree not sitting lower tables anymore when you have some chips
but raise max to what it was ... |
|
Pappa Haze wrote
at 4:42 AM, Monday November 17, 2008 EST Ryan..this new rules are shit man....too many chips to sit on a table ??
Max 50k on 1k tabels ?? Min 250k to play 5k ?? Max 1 million chips on biggest table ?? this really makes no sense, every one is all inning cause u can not lose too much chips anyway. Please change this back |
|
phill_hellmuth wrote
at 4:48 AM, Monday November 17, 2008 EST Yea ryan fails again....what a suprise! now this site is completely worthless.
|
|
scroooge wrote
at 6:03 AM, Monday November 17, 2008 EST Ryan, I understand your quest for serious poker. You've achieved that with tournaments..well done.
I , like most, don't get the new table threshholds. 5k max on the 50 tables was just fine...and I'd keep all with more than 100k off there(its over 200k now) 10k min on the 200 table is a tad high. 5 or 7.5 would keep the 2-3 k mavericks off. And I agree , you've taken the fun out of the 1000 table. That said, this site improves every month. |