Forum
Better table limits
|
Rob S. wrote
at 12:32 PM, Saturday May 30, 2009 EDT
I think the current table limits are too broad. Players with over 100k can come down and dominate the lowest tables by betting with very little to lose. The nature of this free money site makes that a problem because those players can bet on pure garbage and suffer little. The players on the lower tables stuck there by chance or chip count have to try over an over again against the odds to gain a chip stack high enough to get to the next level. When they get there they are vicitimized by the same sort of play, as players with 50-100 times their chips do the same tactics to win. The table upper limits need to be tighter...even if it means haveing more levels for the table limits to accomplish that.
|
Replies 1 - 7 of 7
|
|
Rob S. wrote
at 9:49 AM, Sunday May 31, 2009 EDT I guess no one wants to comment on this. I still think it's a good idea.
|
|
Re-volution wrote
at 10:13 AM, Sunday May 31, 2009 EDT Rob, I don't see much of the "domination" at the 25-50 tables...they're a free for all anyway.
What irks me is the degradation of the 100-200 table, which worked better with 2000-40000 limits. Id like to give the all inners a 100-200 table with 5000-20000 limits, then bring in a 250-500 table with 20000- 50000 limits. |
|
JulesDogg wrote
at 11:56 AM, Sunday May 31, 2009 EDT More choice of blinds should be offered.
20/10 at entry level 50/25 100/50 200/100 500/250 1000/500 2000/1000 5000/2500 etc. Buy in should be 50 BBs min, 200 BBs max. Any size bankroll can sit as long as they can afford then min buy in. Big bankrolls might bully small tables but they gain little and smaller bankrolls can easily adjust their strategy to trap the bullies. 6 seater and 2 seater tables should be added. Bring back SNG format. |
|
Suppository wrote
at 6:43 PM, Monday June 1, 2009 EDT I agree Jules
|
|
WINNER ROBOT wrote
at 2:33 PM, Tuesday June 2, 2009 EDT No need for those kiddie levels. These blinds are good what are working now + a 25k-50k table would be good. 6 and 2 players table are good ideas too. 1st would have a 9 seater 50k, 2nd a 6 seater and 3rd a 2 seater. And etc. at blue medallic players.. Amounts are good Jules.
|
|
Red Hawk wrote
at 8:57 PM, Tuesday June 2, 2009 EDT i agree Rob and Jules
|
|
stafford_wls wrote
at 12:13 AM, Wednesday June 3, 2009 EDT i agree if you can afford to go up you should its free poker for gods sake
|