I have experienced an annoying thing - it is not for the money (lost 3K), but because it makes no sense.

At a point in a tournament, I had a good hand (imo) and did an All-In. Also in that hand called the person who had beaten me (:p) and an 'awayer' (let me call him 'A') who also All-in in that hand. The fact that was an 'awayer' is btw not important.

The annoying thing was that I correctly lost the hand, as A did, but for some reason he exited after me on the tourney. I would have not noticed if 2 things happened at the same time:

1) The exit position was a rewarding position (I got 0 and A got 3K)
2) in the last hand I lost to the winner, but won against A.

Imho, it would make sense that exiting the tournament should follow the same logic as the 'side pot' logic, that is in a single hand, where multiple players had lost at the same time the final chips, the exit order should reflect the position in the last hand...