Forum
Rigged Hand Must Be Stopped
|
8 8 wrote
at 3:50 PM, Tuesday October 20, 2009 EDT
Im not trying to post a bad beat I had on here. I am here to say that there honestly has to be some sort of logarithm or equation on here to have an underdog come from behind by either catching turns, rivers, or combination of the two. Maybe it was on here to begin with for added excitement to the site to kickstart it but it has to stop. The site has lost all integrity to me as a legitimate site because of the amazingly bad beats that occur constantly. It is getting quite ridiculous.
|
« First
‹ Previous
Replies 11 - 16 of 16
|
Rattus wrote
at 12:37 PM, Thursday October 22, 2009 EDT Losers always shout RIGGED site when good hands turn bad. This site isn't rigged, some players think it is but they fail to take into account that with free chips you get lots of callers, lots of callers mean lots of bad beats, simples.
Q. Does anyone actually think that Ryan intentionally fucked up the randomness? |
|
|
8 8 wrote
at 3:15 PM, Thursday October 22, 2009 EDT well it changes the gameplay for people buecause then they overpursue to try to catch flushes or straights because they go on past knolwedge that they got it before and that is not real poker. I get your point zoid but i feel that it should at least be scaled down a little bit
|
|
|
8 8 wrote
at 3:16 PM, Thursday October 22, 2009 EDT Yes Rattus i believe he did to attract people to his site since it did make the game initially more exciting
|
|
odnexa1 wrote
at 4:03 AM, Friday October 23, 2009 EDT ofcourse its fixed to make it more attractive
two pair on flop never wins always multiple people with pockets too many flushes and str on river AA never wins don't you see the advertisement banners on this site ... ryan wants as many people as possible here but if you know how its gonna end you can win big here ... how do you think i got all these blue medals ... thats just because i play according to I know what outcome is gonna be |
|
Delphic wrote
at 12:58 PM, Monday October 26, 2009 EDT Zoid might be right insofar as people do tend to focus more on the bad beats than anything. But I'd suggest there's something further that might skew the number of bad beats here at GPokr that isn't an algorithmic problem, and it's pretty obvious. The simple fact is that with a only a ten minute refill period and the potential to use as many accounts as they want, the newbtards go crazy on what they will bet with and even very tight and solid players who bet only on decent cards are going to see a higher occasion of bad beats simply because there is more random betting action on general.
That being said, I certainly don't see the harm in resolving the question of whether there is an algorithmic problem as well. I don't want my habits skewed by playing with hands that do not accurately represent truly random dispersal. |
|
|
odnexa1 wrote
at 1:31 PM, Monday October 26, 2009 EDT look at this exemple, 4 players have pockets, come on ...
Starting Hand Dealing pocket cards: [5d, 5s] john27 raises $6,000 mark07 calls -MD- folds sprigett calls w widow calls odnexa1 raises $17,900 PadBol folds john27 raises $96,500 mark07 calls sprigett folds w widow calls Dealing flop: [7h, Qh, 4c] Dealing turn: [7s] Dealing river: [Qd] john27 shows [Th, Td] for two pair, Queens and tens mark07 shows [Kh, Kc] for two pair, Kings and Queens w widow shows [8c, 8h] for two pair, Queens and eights odnexa1 shows [5d, 5s] for two pair, Queens and sevens mark07 wins main pot $80,600 mark07 wins side pot $192,300 mark07 wins side pot $40,000 john27 stands up w widow stands up odnexa1 stands up |